🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating governments to establish laws and support services to end all types of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with protesters outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's vote has sparked widespread protest both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 people have endorsed a national petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by false information. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and violence against women had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority support, the head of state could possibly send back the legislation for further review if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "considering state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for gender equality not only in our nation but across the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple European nations
• The European treaty requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable debates in additional member states